Twilight Mirage 33: This Year of Ours: The Speaker: Difference between revisions

From fattwiki
TwilightMirageWiki>1smalldragon
m (Created page with "{{Infobox_episode|title1 = |episodeNumber = 33|focus = Fourteen Fifteen|date = January 16, 2018|length = 80 min|previousEpisode = "This Year of Ours: The Stitch"|nextE...")
 
No edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox_episode|title1 = |episodeNumber = 33|focus = [[Fourteen Fifteen]]|date = January 16, 2018|length = 80 min|previousEpisode = "[[This Year of Ours: The Stitch]]"|nextEpisode = "[[This Year of Ours: The Mystic]]"}}
{{No plot}}{{Infobox_episode|title =  
This Year of Ours: The Speaker | color_theme=tm |episode_number = 33|release_date = January 16, 2018|length = 80 min|previous_episode = "[[This Year of Ours: The Stitch]]"|next_episode = "[[This Year of Ours: The Mystic]]"|episode_page = http://friendsatthetable.net/twilight-mirage-33-this-year-of-ours-the-speaker  |transcript = https://drive.google.com/open?id=11qZTwYvzPOwspWHutp4JUFMfzUjeCqKMHilwTrUd5ig  }}


== Background ==
== Episode description==
<blockquote><em>Feedback by [[Red Equity Janus|Janus, Red Equity]] of the [[Golden Clause]], on a term paper exploring the emerging legal jurisdiction of the [[Quire System]].</em>


=== Episode description ===
Please Note: The grade you’ve received here reflects your successful ability to follow the assignment’s instructions, cite relevant academic and practical work, and build an argument supported by precedent. For that, you should be commended.
<blockquote><em>Feedback by Janus, Red Equity of the Golden Clause, on a term paper exploring the emerging legal jurisdiction of the Quire System.</em><br>
 
<br>
But I am disappointed that you would take up this line of thought.
Please Note: The grade you’ve received here reflects your successful ability to follow the assignment’s instructions, cite relevant academic and practical work, and build an argument supported by precedent. For that, you should be commended.<br>
 
<br>
As you’ve written, politicians of certain persuasion point to moments of crisis, to freshly mapped worlds, to technological frontiers and say that the law does not apply in these places. That that those in power rule arbitrarily during these states of exception.
But I am disappointed that you would take up this line of thought.<br>
 
<br>
But if you take one lesson from me or from this seminar, let it be this: There is no such thing as a lawless place or a time outside of jurisdiction.
As you’ve written, politicians of certain persuasion point to moments of crisis, to freshly mapped worlds, to technological frontiers and say that the law does not apply in these places. That that those in power rule arbitrarily during these states of exception.<br>
 
<br>
Deep below explicit legal precedent, unlisted in any codex, there lie unspoken rules by which society functions. They are fluid, yet bottled by the shape of culture. From the racist resolution of border-region land disputes to the public opinion pardoning of war criminals, a cultural paradigm of gestures and sensibilities guides action.
But if you take one lesson from me or from this seminar, let it be this: There is no such thing as a lawless place or a time outside of jurisdiction.<br>
 
<br>
The so-called “state of exception” is an alibi. If tyranny rises and the people of Quire do not stand to stop it, that is not a sign of the oppressor’s strength, but a memorandum on the population’s capacity to love a despot.
Deep below explicit legal precedent, unlisted in any codex, there lie unspoken rules by which society functions. They are fluid, yet bottled by the shape of culture. From the racist resolution of border-region land disputes to the public opinion pardoning of war criminals, a cultural paradigm of gestures and sensibilities guides action.<br>
 
<br>
Jurisprudence simply follows suit.
The so-called “state of exception” is an alibi. If tyranny rises and the people of Quire do not stand to stop it, that is not a sign of the oppressor’s strength, but a memorandum on the population’s capacity to love a despot.<br>
 
<br>
[[Fourteen Fifteen]], you are a good student, and I hope you grow to understand our role in this system: We are as adjudicators on the verge.
Jurisprudence simply follows suit.<br>
 
<br>
Our role is not simply to interpret the law as written, it is to translate attitude into index. And, in instances where indices are incomplete, to passionately propel the world towards justice.
Fourteen Fifteen, you are a good student, and I hope you grow to understand our role in this system: We are as adjudicators on the verge.<br>
 
<br>
<strong>This week on Twilight Mirage: This Year of Ours: The Speaker</strong>
Our role is not simply to interpret the law as written, it is to translate attitude into index. And, in instances where indices are incomplete, to passionately propel the world towards justice.<br>
 
<br>
<poem><em>Oh I see the lines, there's two lines
<strong>This week on Twilight Mirage: This Year of Ours: The Speaker</strong><br>
You'll live a life anew
<br>
Tell me what you need from me?</em></poem>
<em>Oh I see the lines, there's two lines<br>
You'll live a life anew<br>
Tell me what you need from me?</em><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


== Plot summary ==
==Contents==
===Plot===
{{No plot}}


== Cast ==
== Cast ==
* [[Austin Walker]] (GM)
* [[Austin Walker]] (GM)
* [[Jack de Quidt]] ([[Fourteen Fifteen]])
* [[Jack de Quidt]] ([[Fourteen Fifteen]])
=== Other Appearances ===
{{Twilight Mirage episodes}}
== References ==
{{NavboxTM}}
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Twilight Mirage episodes]]
 
[[Category:Episodes with new music]]
== External links ==
* [http://friendsatthetable.net/twilight-mirage-33-this-year-of-ours-the-speaker Episode page]{{Episodes}}
[[Category:Episodes]]

Latest revision as of 14:48, 10 December 2023

Episode description[edit | edit source]

Feedback by Janus, Red Equity of the Golden Clause, on a term paper exploring the emerging legal jurisdiction of the Quire System.

Please Note: The grade you’ve received here reflects your successful ability to follow the assignment’s instructions, cite relevant academic and practical work, and build an argument supported by precedent. For that, you should be commended.

But I am disappointed that you would take up this line of thought.

As you’ve written, politicians of certain persuasion point to moments of crisis, to freshly mapped worlds, to technological frontiers and say that the law does not apply in these places. That that those in power rule arbitrarily during these states of exception.

But if you take one lesson from me or from this seminar, let it be this: There is no such thing as a lawless place or a time outside of jurisdiction.

Deep below explicit legal precedent, unlisted in any codex, there lie unspoken rules by which society functions. They are fluid, yet bottled by the shape of culture. From the racist resolution of border-region land disputes to the public opinion pardoning of war criminals, a cultural paradigm of gestures and sensibilities guides action.

The so-called “state of exception” is an alibi. If tyranny rises and the people of Quire do not stand to stop it, that is not a sign of the oppressor’s strength, but a memorandum on the population’s capacity to love a despot.

Jurisprudence simply follows suit.

Fourteen Fifteen, you are a good student, and I hope you grow to understand our role in this system: We are as adjudicators on the verge.

Our role is not simply to interpret the law as written, it is to translate attitude into index. And, in instances where indices are incomplete, to passionately propel the world towards justice.

This week on Twilight Mirage: This Year of Ours: The Speaker

Oh I see the lines, there's two lines
You'll live a life anew
Tell me what you need from me?

Contents[edit | edit source]

Plot[edit | edit source]

Cast[edit | edit source]