1smalldragon (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Should this page / Love's page be marked for deletion, or at least combined? They were mentioned in one sentence, ever. ~~~~") Tag: 2017 source edit |
Rigormorphis (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should this page / Love's page be marked for deletion, or at least combined? They were mentioned in one sentence, ever. [[User:1smalldragon|1smalldragon]] ([[User talk:1smalldragon|talk]]) 21:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC) | Should this page / Love's page be marked for deletion, or at least combined? They were mentioned in one sentence, ever. [[User:1smalldragon|1smalldragon]] ([[User talk:1smalldragon|talk]]) 21:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Combining makes sense to me, but I don't see a problem with the pages existing (separately or together) even if there's not much information on them and they're currently not narratively important. Someone somewhere might be curious enough to click a link and find out about them. I personally come from the school of "pages for everything!" when it comes to wikis (aside from Wikipedia, obviously, which has that notability requirement) - I don't see the harm in it. [[User:Rigormorphis|Rigormorphis]] ([[User talk:Rigormorphis|talk]]) 14:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:55, 5 October 2023
Should this page / Love's page be marked for deletion, or at least combined? They were mentioned in one sentence, ever. 1smalldragon (talk) 21:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Combining makes sense to me, but I don't see a problem with the pages existing (separately or together) even if there's not much information on them and they're currently not narratively important. Someone somewhere might be curious enough to click a link and find out about them. I personally come from the school of "pages for everything!" when it comes to wikis (aside from Wikipedia, obviously, which has that notability requirement) - I don't see the harm in it. Rigormorphis (talk) 14:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC)